The Impact of TryHackMe on the Teaching of the Cybersecurity
Keywords:
cybersecurity, higher education, active learning, gamification, pedagogical innovation, TryHackMeAbstract
The teaching of cybersecurity in higher education requires learning experiences that combine theory, practice, and reflection within safe and controlled environments. At the School of Computing and Telecommunications Engineering (EICT) of the Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra (PUCMM), the integration of the TryHackMe platform since January 2024 has aimed to strengthen cybersecurity instruction through virtual labs, guided challenges, and progressive simulations. In this context, this article presents an experience report documenting the implementation process, curricular integration methodology, assessment mechanisms, and motivational strategies used to foster active learning. Through a student-centered approach, progress was achieved in developing technical competencies, participating in Capture The Flag tournaments, and building a culture of continuous practice. In addition, faculty certifications and institutional recognition are highlighted as key factors that reinforced the pedagogical value of the project. Finally, the lessons learned and sustainability challenges are discussed, offering a replicable model of educational innovation in university-level cybersecurity.
Metrics
References
Alotaibi, A., & Almagwashi, H. (2023). Enhancing cybersecurity education through gamified learning platforms: A case study using TryHackMe. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 71(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCAT.2023.127890
Beuran, R., Tang, D., & Chinen, K. (2020). Cybersecurity hands-on training: A case study using CyberRange and gamification. IEEE Transactions on Education, 63(4), 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2020.2983662
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED336049.pdf
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
Chothia, T., Novakovic, C., & Parker, R. (2022). Capture the Flag competitions: Motivating student engagement in cybersecurity. Journal of Cybersecurity Education, Research and Practice, (1), Article 2.
Cruz, E. y González, J. (2023). Integración de entornos virtuales de práctica en la enseñanza universitaria de la ciberseguridad. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología en Educación y Educación en Tecnología, 32(2), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.24215/18509959e134
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Hall, J., & Allen, J. (2022). Building practical cybersecurity skills through simulated environments. Journal of Information Security Education, 13(3), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.5121/jise.2022.13306
Hentea, M. (2021). Perspectives on improving cybersecurity education. Journal of Information Security, 12(3), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.4236/jis.2021.123011
Jovanovic, J., & Popovic, S. (2020). Virtual labs in higher education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5791–5822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.015
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
López, V. (2011). Evaluación formativa y compartida en educación superior: Propuestas, técnicas, instrumentos y experiencias. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 9(1), 159–188. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2011.6180
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Romero, M., & Barberà, E. (2021). Competencias digitales para la educación superior: Nuevos escenarios de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Comunicar, 29(66), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-01
Salas-Rueda, R.-A. (2022). Gamificación y aprendizaje basado en problemas para la enseñanza universitaria: Análisis desde el enfoque por competencias. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 24(2), e17. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2022.24.e17
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise indicated, all articles in this journal are published under a
Licencia Internacional Creative Commons 4.0 Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual .
The authors retain the copyright and assign the right to the first publication to the magazine.
